Tech companies won’t be able to form local governments in Nevada

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak speaks during a voter engagement event at UNLV with Democratic U.S. Vice Presidential Candidate Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) on October 2, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak speaks during a voter engagement event at UNLV with Democratic U.S. running mate, Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) on Oct. 2, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Photo: Ethan Miller (Getty Images)

Nevada GOvernight Steve Sisolak backed down on legislative plans that would have allowed tech companies to form self-sustaining “innovation zones” across the state, reports The Nevada Independent. Instead of allowing categories of technology companies, including blockchain and internet of things, to create what are essentially their own local governments, said Sisolak he turns his idea into a proposed study instead.

With less than 40 days left in Nevada’s current legislative session and the covid-19 pandemic throwing additional logistical and technological hurdles into the mix, there isn’t enough time to fully address the concerns of major groups or agencies like tribal chiefs, water authorities, environmental groups, and labor organizations, to name a few.

“Innovation Zones is a bold proposition for our swhich deserves further attention and discussion, ”Sisolak said in a press release published this morning. “I know lawmakers, stakeholders and Nevadans still have questions, and I want these questions discussed and addressed.”

Sisolak offers the The Nevada legislature creates a special joint committee with its own staff and budget, holds at least one public meeting per month, and submits its findings and recommendations to the Legislative Commission and the governor no later than December. 31, 2021.

Based on the rest of Proposal, as soon as the The Nevada legislature could potentially vote on any bill or bill that is finalized before the 2023 regular session, which typically begins in early February. It will all depend on the extent of the process the special joint committee undertakes by the end of the year – and even assuming that a special joint committee is formed.

In February, at the start of the current legislative session, Las Vegas Journal originally reported that Sisolak proposed a bill at the llegislature but did not formally introduce it. Still, speaking with the Reno Gazette-Journal, Sisolak said he hoped that would be enough time for the lthe legislature to consider the bill. But given the complexity of the project and the number of stakeholders involved, Sisolak said he was not sure that amendments could make the idea of ​​autonomous technology zones possible; tThe proposed draft initially met with intense skepticism from several rural counties, Democratic lawmakers, and tribal and environmental groups. Storey County, for example, officially opposed Sisolak’s “smart city” idea..

There are a lot of problems (or big red flags) that need to be sorted out before any kind of progress can be made on such a dystopian project. Tax breaks would be an obvious draw for these companies, but creating a separate local government would empower them create and manage things that only local governments usually have the power to do, like creating schools and school districts, court systems, taxes, councils supervisors, and so on.

All local ordinances that the supervisory board established within the innovation zone would likely be To cancel county rules, so basically these do whatthey never want to to some extent. Innovation zones would be allowed to create their own attorney, county clerk and sheriff, for example, but at least they wouldn’t be able to levy property taxes, according to the bill. I’m sure most of us have read enough cyberpunk fiction to know how many ways to give tech companies the power to do something like this could go wrong, so it’s a good thing the Nevadans have more time to weigh.

sports Tech Technology Uncategorized world